A clear AI policy.
Disclosed every time.
Generative AI is a tool for this course, not a substitute for the credential's claim about what the learner can do. The lines below apply to all five deliverables, ship with the rubric, and are captured entry-by-entry in the GenAI Provenance Log — a missing or untrue disclosure fails the deliverable.
What's in. What's out.
✓ Permitted with disclosure
- Brainstorming mechanics, generating candidate design ideas, or critiquing your own drafts — provided every use is disclosed.
- Drafting boilerplate sections of the facilitator guide (e.g. risk-mitigation language) — provided you review, revise, and disclose.
- AI coding assistants for prototype scaffolding (Twine templates, early Three.js scaffolds) — provided you can explain every line you submit.
- AI image tools for placeholder assets in low- and medium-fidelity prototypes.
✗ Not permitted
- Submitting AI-generated learning objectives without your own analysis step.
- Submitting AI-generated playtest observations as if they were observed data.
- Submitting AI-generated reflections as Deliverable 5.
- Submitting a prototype whose interaction design you cannot explain or modify.
Three lines per deliverable.
AI Use Disclosure (appendix in every deliverable)
Each of the five deliverables ships with a short appendix titled AI Use Disclosure. Three items, no more:
- Which tool(s) were used.
- On which sections.
- What you changed after the tool's contribution.
Log each AI interaction in the GenAI Provenance Log — your per-entry AIAS declaration plus revision notes satisfies items 1–3 of this appendix.
Declare each use on the AI Assessment Scale (AIAS)
- 1 · No AI — the work is entirely your own; no AI used at any stage.
- 2 · AI Planning — AI for brainstorming, planning, and structuring; the submitted work is AI-free.
- 3 · AI Collaboration — AI helps draft or refine; you critically evaluate and modify the output.
- 4 · Full AI — AI completes the task; your role is directing and curating it.
- 5 · AI Exploration — AI used creatively to explore and co-design beyond the brief.
Scale from Perkins, Furze, Roe, & MacVaugh (2024) — see the reference list.
The credential's claim is the point.
Source: Educational Game Design Micro-Credential Course Handbook, v2, §7. See references for the empirical basis.