Post-completion survey

Help improve the TeachPlay credential.

Complete this after requesting or receiving your certificate. The survey captures what worked, where students needed more support, and which learning artifacts can inform program evaluation and future research.

Estimated time: 6 to 8 minutes. Required fields support certificate matching and program improvement. Research use is separated so you can choose whether de-identified responses may be used in publications or presentations, when permitted by institutional review.

Background before TeachPlay

Game design experience before this credential AI tool experience before this credential Programming or prototyping experience

Learning outcomes after completion

Use 1 = strongly disagree and 5 = strongly agree.

I can align a learning objective, game mechanic, feedback signal, and evidence claim.

I can scope a playable five-minute learning loop without overbuilding the game.

I can document AI prompts, outputs, revisions, rejected ideas, and human decisions.

I can plan a small playtest and collect evidence that informs revision.

I can revise a game concept based on learner evidence rather than preference alone.

I can explain accessibility, ethics, privacy, and implementation risks in my design.

Module experience across the 12-session sequence

Rate each module for clarity, usefulness, and workload fit. These items help identify where beginners need additional support.

Which modules need more support?

Video, readings, and case studies

The walkthrough video made the login, learning, completion, and certificate flow clear.

The narration sounded natural and helped me follow the student journey.

Captions and transcripts were useful for review or accessibility.

Module readings and references gave enough support without feeling overloaded.

The Space Invaders case helped me understand objective-to-mechanic alignment.

The Chalk and Chance case helped me understand role, narrative, uncertainty, or facilitation design.

Evidence artifacts and AI use

D1 learner context and learning problem D2 objective-to-mechanic crosswalk D3 prototype or implementation specification D4 playtest and audit evidence D5 final defense and implementation packet AI provenance log

Primary AI tools used Total time spent on the credential

Transfer, barriers, and follow-up

I can apply this design process to a real course, workshop, or learner support context.

I would recommend this credential to another educator or designer.

I know what next step I would take to continue developing my game or design packet.

What will you apply first? What barrier would most likely stop you from using this work?

I am willing to be contacted for a short 3- or 6-month follow-up about whether I used the design process or artifact after the credential.

Open feedback What should the TeachPlay team change before the next cohort?